Weather forecasting breakthrough

It seems only fitting as hurricane season is well underway that some news about weather forecasting get the spotlight. The Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, in a multiple partnership led by NOAA, successfully demonstrated never before achieved storm forecasting by producing higher resolution results than currently used forecasting models are capable of. Over a three month period from April to June, PSC utilized a new forecasting model on its Terascale Computing System to generate three forecasts a day over an area of the Great Plains in the midwest. According to Kelvin Droegemeier, director of the Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms at the University of Oklahoma and one of the partners of the effort,

Results from the spring experiment suggest that the atmosphere may be fundamentally more predictable at the scale of individual storms and especially organized storm systems than previously thought. Real time daily forecasts over such a large area and with such high spatial resolution have never been attempted before.

It’s good to see a parallel software success story as is the case with this new weather modeling system called the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model, especially given the fact that high performance software development lags well behind the much publicized advances in computing power.

The full story can be found on PSC’s website here.

2 Responses to “Weather forecasting breakthrough”

  1. marketing coach Says:

    I am wondering the software is available here in Australia for our Cyclone seasons. Particulary for the top end of Australia.

    Also, can someone tell me the force difference between a cyclone and a hurricane..

    Andrew

  2. Univ. of Tennessee Watcher Says:

    Hey Andrew.

    You might try contacting the folks at the Center in Oklahoma - info@caps.ou.edu. They can probably help you out on both fronts.

    Scott

The moderators and/or administrators of this weblog reserve the right to edit or delete ANY content that appears on the site. In other words, the moderators and administrators have complete discretion over the removal of any content deemed by them to be inappropriate, in full or in part.

Any opinions expressed on this site belong to their respective authors and are not necessarily shared by the sponsoring institutions or the National Science Foundation.

Any trademarks or trade names, registered or otherwise, that appear on this site are the property of their respective owners and, unless noted, do not represent endorsement by the editors, publishers, sponsoring institutions, the National Science Foundation, or any other member of the CTWatch team.

No guarantee is granted by CTWatch that information appearing in the Blog is complete or accurate. Information on this site is not intended for commercial purposes.