Panel Discussion of Grid Vendors

NetworkWorld has published the transcript of a grid computing panel discussion among leaders from various commercial vendors, including IBM and Cisco. While the discussion has an obvious commercial slant, some interesting thoughts and opinions about the pros and cons of grid computing are shared by some of the leading players. Some of the responses to the moderator questions truly expose the position of some vendors, which may or may not be common knowledge.

One Response to “Panel Discussion of Grid Vendors”

  1. Univ. of Tennessee Watcher Says:

    The panel discussion you point to is extremely interesting on various fronts. The one that leaped out at me was the way in which this vendor perspective on the grid focuses on “the enterprise.” This is a pretty significant difference from the general point of the research community, especially if you think of the academic research community. There the “enterprises,” in so far as you can identify them, are research universities. The main goal of creating a grid is “cross enterprise” collaboration and resource sharing, e.g. between scientists at different universities. It’s not primarily about rationalizing the cost of or optimizing the efficiency of IT infrastructure investments within an enterprise, though people want to do that too of course. For these vendors, grids enable collaboration and resource sharing within an enterprise, say between different company divisions, not across different enterprises. This difference in perspective affects the way you think about the key issue of interoperability.

The moderators and/or administrators of this weblog reserve the right to edit or delete ANY content that appears on the site. In other words, the moderators and administrators have complete discretion over the removal of any content deemed by them to be inappropriate, in full or in part.

Any opinions expressed on this site belong to their respective authors and are not necessarily shared by the sponsoring institutions or the National Science Foundation.

Any trademarks or trade names, registered or otherwise, that appear on this site are the property of their respective owners and, unless noted, do not represent endorsement by the editors, publishers, sponsoring institutions, the National Science Foundation, or any other member of the CTWatch team.

No guarantee is granted by CTWatch that information appearing in the Blog is complete or accurate. Information on this site is not intended for commercial purposes.