Conventional Wisdom on Grand Challenges

To our mind, the first Grand Challenge should be coming up with a new name for Grand Challenges. We’ve been slinging this term around for at least two decades now.

The British Computer Society disagrees, apparently. According to InfoWorld:

A group of British computer scientists have proposed a number of “grand challenges” for IT that they hope will drive forward research, similar to the way the human genome project drove life sciences research through the 1990s. Ambitious goals include harnessing the power of quantum physics, building systems that can’t go wrong, and simulating living creatures in every detail.

The lowdown (as a .pdf) is available from the BCS themselves.

One Response to “Conventional Wisdom on Grand Challenges”

  1. E Moritz Says:

    ‘Grand Challenge’ is a conceptual description - the term is solid, though the application and adoption is not. A remedy appearing at http://grand-challenge.net/ is to implement a harness scale for ‘Grand Challenges’.

The moderators and/or administrators of this weblog reserve the right to edit or delete ANY content that appears on the site. In other words, the moderators and administrators have complete discretion over the removal of any content deemed by them to be inappropriate, in full or in part.

Any opinions expressed on this site belong to their respective authors and are not necessarily shared by the sponsoring institutions or the National Science Foundation.

Any trademarks or trade names, registered or otherwise, that appear on this site are the property of their respective owners and, unless noted, do not represent endorsement by the editors, publishers, sponsoring institutions, the National Science Foundation, or any other member of the CTWatch team.

No guarantee is granted by CTWatch that information appearing in the Blog is complete or accurate. Information on this site is not intended for commercial purposes.