« Rumination on innovation
OSU team proposes new approach to quantum computing »

Academic leaders weigh in on computational science

In an HPC Wire article from April 22nd, Dan Reed, Jack Dongarra, and Ken Kennedy question the direction of the government’s investment strategy for high performance computing and computational science. Noting that there are as many opportunities as ever to utilize high-end computing, the three HPC leaders call for better cohesion and greater vision by the federal agencies charged with investing the nation’s computational research dollars:

High-end computing and cyberinfrastructure are both part of a broad and empowering vision of computing-enabled science; it is not an “either or” situation. Both are central, both are critical, and neither can be sacrificed for the other.

This entry was posted on Monday, April 25th, 2005 at 1:39 pm and is filed under Policy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

One Response to “Academic leaders weigh in on computational science”

  1. Tim Curns Says:
    April 26th, 2005 at 3:31 pm

    HPCwire is looking for comments from readers and luminaries in the field on this piece and related topics. Please do not hesitate to contact editor Tim Curns at tim@hpcwire.com. Please include your name/title and whether or not you want your comments to be considered for publication. We are seeking to raise as much awareness as possible.

The moderators and/or administrators of this weblog reserve the right to edit or delete ANY content that appears on the site. In other words, the moderators and administrators have complete discretion over the removal of any content deemed by them to be inappropriate, in full or in part.

Any opinions expressed on this site belong to their respective authors and are not necessarily shared by the sponsoring institutions or the National Science Foundation.

Any trademarks or trade names, registered or otherwise, that appear on this site are the property of their respective owners and, unless noted, do not represent endorsement by the editors, publishers, sponsoring institutions, the National Science Foundation, or any other member of the CTWatch team.

No guarantee is granted by CTWatch that information appearing in the Blog is complete or accurate. Information on this site is not intended for commercial purposes.