CUDA vs. OpenCL development
CUDA vs. OpenCL development
Looking at the release history, I'm seeing continual updates to the CUDA version and a two-year-old OpenCL version. I'm curious as to the history, as MAGMA looks like the best bet for an OpenCL variant of LAPACK, but the lack of updates doesn't instill confidence.
Last edited by Stubb on Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: CUDA vs. OpenCL development
We are actually working on a new release of clMAGMA that would bring it closer to CUDA MAGMA, and thus easier to maintain and have regular releases. I expect a new release in November. Code should be available before then in the bitbucket repository.
-mark
-mark
Re: CUDA vs. OpenCL development
Thanks for the quick reply. Will keep my eyes out for it.
Is there an FFT library that MAGMA users tend to utilize?
Is there an FFT library that MAGMA users tend to utilize?
Re: CUDA vs. OpenCL development
I think most OpenCL users would use the clFFT library (https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clFFT) from the clMathLibraries group (those who maintain clBLAS).